|
Planned_Parenthood234
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Pro-Death
Birthday: 3/1/1973
Gender: Male
Interests: Killing/murdering children, telling women they are pregnant and then terrorizing them into submission, "familly planning."
Expertise: "Surgical" procedure. (Abortrion)
Occupation: Medical
Industry: Retail
Message: message meEmail: email me
Website: visit my website
Member Since:
8/3/2005
|
|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| I return!!
I was just letting everyone know i am not dropping this site, i just havent really had the time to do much with it, sorry.
Well, i feel like there's a need for an article, so ill get on it.
| | |
| My state (ca) doesn't care bout their daughter or babies. Apparently
rape is acceptable to cover up, and apparently parents should never
know about their child's invasive surgery/emotional damage. Apparently
adults raping minor girls is okay, or at least should not be brought to
the attention of the authorities. Apparently the clause in Prop. 73
that says minors dont have to tell abusive parents isn't good enough.
Actually, the reason that we lost is because of the stupid asses who
were in favor of 73 and wouldn't vote.
And then their is our lovely Governer, who screwed us over by endorsing
crap that would never pass, making the majority of Democrats vote no on
EVERY proposition. Oh yeah, and then theirs those people who were to
lazy to differentiate between 73 and 74-77.
I am dissapointed in California, but for some reason I can't say I am surprised.
| | |
| Students, please visit www.silentday.org and take part.
| | |
| This is why have to do this.
When I heard this I was shocked, but now I realise I shouldn't have
been. Geez, where the hell are the kids parents, a 14 year old girl
with a 22 year old man!?!?!? And the PP chick doesn't even care to
report the rape to the police, all she seems worried about is cashing
in on the murder of child!
| | |
| I have against the rhetoric idea because there are more pressing matters at hand, california's Prop 73.
There are a few important points to what Prop 73 (Parent Right to Know)
will mean for california. The main thing to know about this law is
that, in the words of the Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, the
proposal requires "Written notice [to] be provided to the parent or
gaurdian personally- for example, when a parent or gaurdian accompanied
the minor to an office examination or to receive the abortion itself."
Also the notice can be received by mail. The process would require a
physician or their representative to send a written notice by certified
as well as first class mail.
Notification would not be required if a doctor declares that there is
an emergency that would cause "the mothers death," or that a delay
would cause "serious risk or substantial and irreversabel impairment of
a major bodily function." Another way that notification would not be
forced is if a parent signs a waiver before hand saying that it is not
neccassary for him/her to receive notification.
Also, a minor can appear in court, or a temporary gaurdian can appear
for them. The court would not be like a criminal proceeding, but
instaed it would be in private chambers. Also, the juvenile may have a
court or otherwise appointed lawyer. The court would have to hear and
decide within four business days. It is important to note, as well,
that the minor would not have to pay court fees.
A great deal of good would come from this law regarding coercion as
well. According to the analysis quoted earlier in the Official Voter
Information Guide, "The measure allows a minor to seek help from a
juvenile court if anyone were to attempt to coerce her to have an
abortion." The court would have to consider a case with haste, and the
court could take any action to ensure the safety of the mother and
prevent coercion and abuse.
Many argue that this measure would not be a good one because some women
have a bad situation at home. While this is a important factor in
deciding your veiw on the law, and laws like across America, there is
something that most people ignore. As I stated earlier, minors can go
before a judge for any reason and attempt to receive a waiver. The
minor would have to convince the court that she was informed enough to
make the decision for herself, and she would have to explain the
stituation to the judge. This would put abusive parents behind bars, as
well as statutory rapists who would ordinarily get of free for lack of
evidence. (7 of 10 abortions performed on minors are on babies that are
a result of sex with a partner 22 or older.).
There are a number of other great points to this law, but I can't talk
aboput all of them right now. I hope this helps in your understanding
of such laws. Please don't knock me on spelling, there is a problem with the spell checker.
| | |
|
